Exploration continues north of Moncton despite repeated public outcry. According to a report by the CBC, one potential driller has found enough deposits of the toxic mineral to progress its exploration to the next phase. To the best of my understanding, this exploration started last summer and immediatly met criticism from the public. One major concern is that uranium mining will contaminate the Turtle Creek watershed, which provides water to Dieppe, Moncton, and Riverview.
I did some quick looking around into the potential dangers of uranium.
The following information is provided by the B.C. Medical Association.
The present average allowable exposure to the public [ of 0.02 WL of radon exposure ] could result in 200-300 extra cases of lung cancer per 10,000 people per lifetime. In light of current knowledge, this might be considered tantamount to allowing an industrially induced and publicly sanctioned epidemic of cancer.
Radon contamination of ground water may be a health risk in pincushion drilling typical of advanced exploration, yet under present AECB regulations, a couple of hundred drill holes can be made without obtaining a license. AECB admitted to having no scientific data to show this is safe; the regulation was based on an arbitrary administrative decision.
The BCMA calls for an Emergency Task Force into tightening the present radiation standards. Review by the AECB or by its Committees is unacceptable; the Task Force should be under the Advisory Council on Occupational Health and Safety or the Science Council of Canada
How desperate are we for jobs? New Brunswick will not profit from Uranium mining. Inevitably what will happen is that some major companies will reap huge rewards and the people of southeastern NB will get lung cancer. We don’t have to put up with this. The news out of Saskatchewan is that their economy is booming. What we’re not being told is that there are hundreds of millions of tons of uranium mine waste that are going to be left to poison the future. In an article published in the Edmonton Journal, a mine that has cost 500 million to bring into production could not prevent major flooding. Industry and government would like to maintain the illusion that they can control and contain these hazardous materials. The truth is that total control is impossible. Abstinance is the only way to make sure that you don’t get fucked. All it takes to stop this from happening is for us to stand up and be counted.
In addition to the immediate environmental and health concerns there are the ethical considerations inherent to the uses that uranium is put to.
One of the most disquieting things I’ve ever come across is the birth defects and abhorrent effects of
Depleted Uranium rounds. Most of the images I have seen come out of Iraq.
Anyone who wants to make the argument that uranium mining is good for the economy, take a good long look at this child and try to imagine the pain in your heart you’d feel if that child were yours.



2 comments
Comments feed for this article
April 3, 2008 at 2:11 pm
Rosemary Stephen
Very well done
I really enjoy reading this article. I cannot undersdtand why people that we have elected make wrong decision. I do not think that unemployment should be the trigger to accept uranium mining. When you look at wars,why do we need depleted uranium to kill our enemies. Why are we still at war with one another? I do not see any good reason. The only reason is power.
Poor child. This child was born to show us what not to do. It is in the same line as the Minamata picture where a mother was tenderly caring for her affected son.
Well done
May 10, 2008 at 1:44 am
Steve Hill
Uranium is considerably denser than lead, that is why it is used in ammunition.
Your article cites no scientific evidence. Common mining practices allow for safe mining methods and activities. Remediation must be in place prior to beginning to mine.
Nova Scotia’s moratorium was wrongly put in place, and damaged many companies. There is absolutely no reason that the ban should be kept in place. Read about the McCleave inquiry, that decided in 1985 that uranium could be safely lifted but due to low uranium prices, the issue was not pushed.
The public does not understand uranium or mining, and should educate themselves prior to taking a side. And by educate, I don’t mean read these lie filled sites, showing pictures of deformities cause by nuclear fuel or uranium ammunition and claiming its from a mine.
You realize that an area will be less radioactive after mining than before right?